Illustration of P.S. 051 Elias Howe
ElemSchool code (DBN) 02M051

P.S. 051 Elias Howe

About

P.S. 051 Elias Howe serves students in grades K-5 with an enrollment of 383 students, which is near the citywide median. The school's Economic Need Index of 75 percent is near the citywide median, while its 42 percent English Language Learner population is well above the citywide 75th percentile. In Grade 3-8 state tests, 53 percent of students demonstrated ELA proficiency and 50 percent demonstrated math proficiency, both near citywide medians. The school received a "Good" rating for safety and school climate, with 97 percent of parents surveyed in 2025-2026 reporting their child is safe. Relationships with families received an "Excellent" rating, and 99 percent of parents surveyed reported teachers treat them as partners. Parents also expressed high satisfaction, with 97 percent satisfied with their child's education in 2025-2026. The instruction and performance rating for the school is "Fair".

Sources (4)

Academics

State test proficiency rates and acceleration.

ELA proficiency

53%

Math proficiency

50%

3-K - School DayBalancedlow confidence
Kindergarten (02M051)Balancedlow confidence
Pre-K - School DayBalancedlow confidence

Proficiency rates are from the Grade 3–8 NYS state test (school-level).

Attendance rate

97%

Avg class size (general ed)

19.67

Avg class size (ICT)

23.27

Average class size by classroom setting: general education vs. ICT (Integrated Co-Teaching, where general- and special-education students learn together with two teachers). NYC DOE Class Size Report, 2021–22.

Community & climate

Demographics, attendance, school survey results, and DOE quality ratings.

Quality signals

FacultyGoodAI-estimated
InstructionFair
Safety & climateGood
Family tiesExcellent

DOE quality-rating labels are skewed across the system; read them relative to the citywide distribution in our methodology.

NYC School Survey, 2025-26

Parent survey · overall positive

94%52% response rate

Teacher survey · overall positive

88%79% response rate

Survey topics, 2025-26

Safety95%city 93%
  • Teachers · My students are safe…outside around this school. [Elementary only].89%
  • Teachers · My students are safe…traveling between home and this school. [Elementary only].89%
  • Teachers · My students are safe…in the hallways, bathrooms, locker rooms, and cafeteria of this school. [Elementary only].100%
  • Teachers · My students are safe…in my class(es). [Elementary only].100%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 93% citywide.

Bullying prevention76%city 65%
  • Teachers · At this school students harass, bully, or intimidate other students.76%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (76%) is their average, vs 65% citywide.

Emotional support87%city 84%
  • Teachers · How many adults at this school…help students develop the skills they need to complete challenging coursework despite obstacles?91%
  • Teachers · How many adults at this school…tell their students they believe they can achieve high academic standards?91%
  • Teachers · How many adults at this school…teach students how to advocate for themselves?88%
  • Teachers · How many adults at this school…recognize disruptive behavior as social-emotional learning opportunities?85%
  • Teachers · How many adults at this school…have access to school-based supports to assist in behavioral/emotional escalations?79%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (87%) is their average, vs 84% citywide.

Academic expectations95%city 89%
  • Teachers · In this school, the staff believes that all students can learn, including Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs), Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs), and students with disabilities.97%
  • Teachers · This school has well-defined learning expectations for all students.94%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…have to work hard to do well?93%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.

College & career guidance96%city 90%
  • Teachers · It’s a priority at this school that adults…provide students with opportunities to learn about different career paths. [Elementary/Middle Only].96%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 90% citywide.

Family outreach97%city 95%
  • Teachers · At this school…teachers understand families' challenges and concerns.97%
  • Teachers · At this school…teachers work closely with families to meet students' needs.100%
  • Teachers · At this school…staff regularly communicate with families about how they can help students learn.100%
  • Teachers · At this school…school staff value families' race, ethnicity, culture, family structure, and background.100%
  • Parents · School staff regularly communicate with me about how I can help my child learn.93%
  • Parents · Teachers work closely with me to meet my child's needs.94%
  • Parents · My child's school communicates with me in a language that I can understand.98%
  • Parents · I am greeted warmly when I contact or visit the school.94%
  • Parents · My child's school will make me aware if there are any concerns about my child’s social or emotional well-being.94%
  • Parents · If I suspect my child needs additional learning supports and services, I know the next steps to get support at my school.95%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 95% citywide.

Parent–teacher trust97%city 96%
  • Parents · I feel respected by my child's teachers.97%
  • Parents · Staff at this school work hard to build trusting relationships with parents/guardians like me.95%
  • Parents · My child's teachers treat me as a partner in educating my child.99%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Show all survey topics

Instruction and Performance

Early Childhood Instruction100%city 94%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…meet the needs of the children in my classroom. [Early childhood].100%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…develop and facilitate intentional learning experiences grounded in the developmentally appropriate practices and play-based learning experiences emphasized in New York State Prekindergarten Learning Standards (NYSPLS) and/or Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework (ELOF). [Early childhood].100%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…help children engage with books and materials, or in other learning activities reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Early childhood].100%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (100%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.

Cultural Awareness and Inclusive Classroom Instruction97%city 92%
  • Teachers · I am able to...receive support around how to incorporate students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds in my practice.100%
  • Teachers · I am able to...appropriately modify instructional activities and materials to meet the developmental needs and learning interests of all my students.97%
  • Teachers · I am able to...ensure instruction represents multiple perspectives, cultures, and backgrounds.97%
  • Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple races and ethnicities.100%
  • Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations.97%
  • Teachers · I am able to...design instruction that is responsive to students’ needs (e.g. Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs) or Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs) proficiency and students with disabilities).97%
  • Teachers · I am able to...apply my knowledge of parents' various cultural backgrounds when collaborating with them regarding their child's educational progress.97%
  • Teachers · I am able to...develop appropriate Individualized Education Programs for my students with disabilities.94%
  • Teachers · I am able to...monitor progress on Individualized Education Program goals for my students with disabilities.91%
  • Teachers · I am able to...distinguish linguistic/cultural differences from learning difficulties.100%
  • Teachers · I have conversations about race and racism at my school that help me examine my own beliefs around identity.91%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.

IEP Service Satisfaction94%city 91%
  • Parents · I am satisfied with the educational planning and Individualized Education Program (IEP) development process at this school. [Families of students with IEPs].94%
  • Parents · At this school, my child receives what they need to achieve their Individualized Education Program (IEP) goal(s). [Families of students with IEPs].97%
  • Parents · This school offers a wide enough variety of activities and services (including specialized programs, related services and assistive and adaptive technologies where appropriate) to help improve outcomes for my child. [Families of students with IEPs].91%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 91% citywide.

Family Satisfaction with Child's Education93%city 94%
  • Parents · My child is progressing in reading the way I would expect.91%
  • Parents · My child is progressing in math the way I would expect.91%
  • Parents · My child's school helps me understand what grade-level schoolwork looks like.91%
  • Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The education my child has received this year.97%
  • Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The overall quality of my child's teachers this year.97%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.

Strong Core Instruction85%city 92%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [Social Studies].78%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Social Studies].78%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Social Studies].78%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Social Studies].88%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [Social Studies].78%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [ELA].100%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [ELA].100%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [ELA].81%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [ELA].75%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [ELA].81%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Math].94%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Math].82%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Math].88%
  • Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [Math].88%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (85%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.

Classroom Behavior64%city 68%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…listen carefully when the teacher gives directions?55%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…follow the rules in class?79%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…respond to challenging questions in class?36%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…do their work when they are supposed to?85%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (64%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.

Quality of Student Discussion61%city 68%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…build on each other’s ideas during class discussions?55%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…use data or text references to support their ideas?52%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…show that they respect each other’s ideas?79%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…provide constructive feedback to their peers/teachers?45%
  • Teachers · How many students in your classes…participate in class discussions at some point?76%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (61%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.

Safety and School Climate

Inclusive Learning Environment99%city 96%
  • Teachers · At this school, students with disabilities are included in all school activities.100%
  • Teachers · This school educates students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment appropriate.97%
  • Teachers · School staff treat students of different genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations equally.100%
  • Teachers · School staff treat students of different races, cultures, or backgrounds equally.97%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (99%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Inclusive Leadership96%city 96%
  • Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…puts decisions made with families into action.96%
  • Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…works to create a sense of community in the school.97%
  • Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…ensures families are comfortable communicating with the school.96%
  • Parents · Language translation and interpretation are readily available to me at all family events at my child’s school.94%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Instructional Leadership96%city 89%
  • Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...makes clear to the staff their expectations for meeting instructional goals.94%
  • Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...understands how children learn.97%
  • Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...sets high standards for student learning.100%
  • Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…supports teachers in implementing what they have learned in professional development.97%
  • Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…carefully tracks student academic progress.100%
  • Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…knows what’s going on in my classes.94%
  • Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…provides teachers with formative feedback to improve practice.100%
  • Teachers · The principal/school leader at this school...participates in instructional planning with teams of teachers.82%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.

Teacher-Principal Trust95%city 86%
  • Teachers · I feel respected by the principal/program leader at this school.100%
  • Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.94%
  • Teachers · The principal/program leader has confidence in the expertise of the teachers at this school.97%
  • Teachers · I trust the principal/program leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).94%
  • Teachers · The principal/program leader looks out for the personal welfare of the staff members.88%
  • Teachers · The principal/program leader places the needs of children ahead of personal interests.94%
  • Teachers · The principal and assistant principals function as a cohesive unit.97%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 86% citywide.

School Commitment93%city 85%
  • Teachers · I usually look forward to each working day at this school.97%
  • Teachers · I would recommend this school to parents/guardians seeking a place for their child.88%
  • Teachers · I would recommend this school to other teachers as a place to work.94%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.

Peer Collaboration91%city 88%
  • Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader, teachers, and staff collaborate to make this school run effectively.100%
  • Teachers · At this school…teachers design instructional programs (e.g. lessons, units) together.85%
  • Teachers · At this school…teachers make a conscious effort to coordinate their teaching with instruction at other grade levels.88%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (91%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.

Program Coherence91%city 85%
  • Teachers · At this school…curriculum, instruction, and learning materials are well coordinated across the different grade levels at this school.94%
  • Teachers · At this school…once we start a new program, we follow up to make sure that it’s working.88%
  • Teachers · At this school…it is clear how all of the programs offered are connected to our school’s instructional vision.91%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (91%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.

Conflict Resolution91%city 90%
  • Teachers · Conflicts are resolved fairly in my school.91%
  • Parents · Conflicts are resolved fairly at my child’s school. [Grades K-5].90%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (91%) is their average, vs 90% citywide.

Teacher-Teacher Trust90%city 88%
  • Teachers · Teachers in this school trust each other.88%
  • Teachers · It's OK in this school to discuss feelings, worries, and frustrations with other teachers.88%
  • Teachers · I feel respected by other teachers at this school.94%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (90%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.

Innovation and Collective Responsibility79%city 81%
  • Teachers · How many teachers at this school…help build a welcoming school environment in the entire school, not just their classroom?85%
  • Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are actively trying to improve their teaching?82%
  • Teachers · How many teachers at this school…take responsibility for improving the school?74%
  • Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are eager to try new ideas?71%
  • Teachers · How many teachers at this school…feel responsible that all students learn?85%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (79%) is their average, vs 81% citywide.

Teacher Influence79%city 68%
  • Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader encourages feedback through regular meetings with families and teacher leaders.85%
  • Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...hiring new professional personnel?94%
  • Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...planning how discretionary school funds should be used?64%
  • Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...selecting instructional materials and/or curriculum used in classrooms?65%
  • Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...setting standards for student behavior?88%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (79%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.

Quality of Professional Development78%city 85%
  • Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...included enough time to think carefully about, try, and evaluate new ideas.85%
  • Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...Included opportunities to engage in inquiry-based, professional collaboration with peers and/or mentors from other schools.68%
  • Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...directly related to my students’ needs.82%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (78%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.

Relationships with Families

Strong Relationships96%city 97%
  • Parents · I feel good about the way that my child’s teachers helped my child adjust to their program. [Birth-5].96%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 97% citywide.

Parent-Principal Trust95%city 96%
  • Parents · I feel respected by my child's principal/school leader.96%
  • Parents · I trust the principal/school leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).95%
  • Parents · The principal/school leader is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.95%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Parent Involvement in School94%city 92%
  • Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…communicated with your child's teachers about your child's performance?95%
  • Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…seen your child’s projects, artwork, homework, tests, or quizzes?96%
  • Parents · I know how to contact the Parent Coordinator at my child’s school.96%
  • Parents · During the school year, have you...attended a school meeting, school event, or parent-teacher conference (virtually or in-person)?93%
  • Parents · My child’s teachers incorporate my feedback into how they support my child. [Birth-5].92%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.

Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Teacher94%city 96%
  • Parents · My child’s teachers give me helpful ideas about how I can support my child’s learning and development. [Birth-5].92%
  • Parents · My child’s teachers let me know that I can make a difference in my child’s learning. [Birth-5].96%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Advocate78%city 87%
  • Parents · Someone at my child's program has helped me consider which schools or programs would be best for my child for next school/program year. [Birth-5].78%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (78%) is their average, vs 87% citywide.

School Description

School Facilities and Services93%city 88%
  • Teachers · This school is kept clean.100%
  • Teachers · This school is kept in good physical condition.97%
  • Teachers · Physical repairs to the school building are completed in a timely manner.94%
  • Parents · This school is kept clean.96%
  • Parents · This school is kept in good physical condition.98%
  • Parents · My child's school provides me information about transportation options (e.g. Metrocard and busing).91%
  • Parents · I am satisfied with my child’s school bus transportation service this year.92%
  • Parents · I am satisfied with the meal options provided at my child’s school.79%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.

Overall positive % is averaged across every Pos/Neg survey question per respondent group (school year 2025-2026). Survey topics are the DOE’s framework measures (each the average favorable response across its questions; expand a topic to see them and the citywide average); the dimension scores themselves are no longer in the public data file.[3]

Operational health

Attendance

97%

Chronic absenteeism

50%

Suspension rate

0%

Teachers[7]

Teachers with 4+ years' experience

76%

Students per teacher

10:1

Teaching out of certification

0%

Teacher experience and certification from the NYSED School Report Card (2024–25); students per teacher = enrollment ÷ reported teachers. Fewer than 4 years counts as inexperienced.

Student body

Race / ethnicity[4]

  • Asian 7%
  • Black 14%
  • Hispanic 62%
  • White 14%
  • Multiracial 2%

School-level totals; may not sum to 100% due to rounding and small subgroup suppression.

Gender[4]

  • Female 46%
  • Male 54%

Female / male shares as published by the DOE; other gender identities aren’t reported in the source data.

Enrollment

383

Economic Need Index

75%

Free / reduced lunch

77%

English learners

42%

Students with IEPs

26%

Admissions

Seats, applicants, and admissions method from the most recent cycle. Where the school enrolls separate tracks (general ed, students with disabilities, specialized education), each track is shown on its own row, with its priority order beneath it.

Kindergarten (02M051)

Program code 02M051KG · Cycle 2024-2025

Zoned

52 applicants · 75 seats last year; every priority group with applicants received offers.

priority groupSeatsApplicantsApplications / seat
General education7552—
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school.
———
↳ Other students who live in the zone.
30301.00
↳ Students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school.
———
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school.
———
↳ Students who live in the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K.
———
↳ Students who live outside the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K.
———
↳ Other students who live in the district.
10101.00
↳ Other students who live outside the district.
———

Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).

How to read Applications / seat and where the outlook buckets come from is explained in our methodology.

Financials

[8][9]

What this school has to spend, and what it spends it on. Spending is not a measure of quality. Schools serving more students with higher needs receive more money.

Spending

Total spend

$15.4MStudents: 453

58th percentile citywide

School-managed budget

$8.8MPositions: 71

59th percentile citywide

Total spend per student

$33,921

53rd percentile citywide · city median $33,357

Staffing costs

Principal’s salary

$203K

50th percentile citywide

Principal and assistant principals

$352KPositions: 2

22nd percentile citywide

Teaching staff

$4.4MPositions: 40

55th percentile citywide

Where the school-managed budget goes

These five categories add up to the school-managed budget. They do not include the centrally-paid costs in total spend.

PositionsAvg eachBudget
Leadership2$176K$352K
  • HEAD OF SCHOOL1$203K$203K
  • ASST HEAD OF SCHOOL1$149K$149K
Teachers40$111K$4.4M
  • Pre K / WHOLE CLASS3$152K$455K
  • 5 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher2$152K$303K
  • 2 / WHOLE CLASS2$128K$255K
  • 1 / WHOLE CLASS2$123K$247K
  • 3 / WHOLE CLASS2$108K$216K
  • ESL / WHOLE CLASS2$104K$208K
  • 5 / ICT - General Ed Teacher2$102K$204K
  • 3-K / WHOLE CLASS1$152K$152K
  • 4 / WHOLE CLASS2$68K$136K
  • 3 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$135K$135K
  • PHYSICAL EDUCATION / WHOLE CLASS1$132K$132K
  • K / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$132K$132K
  • MUSIC / WHOLE CLASS1$129K$129K
  • K / WHOLE CLASS2$63K$126K
  • SCIENCE - GENERAL SCIENCE / SUBJECT SPECIFIC1$113K$113K
  • 1 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$104K$104K
  • 1 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$104K$104K
  • 2 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$104K$104K
  • 2 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$104K$104K
  • 3 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$104K$104K
  • 4 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$104K$104K
  • 4 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$104K$104K
  • 4, 5 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$104K$104K
  • 5 / WHOLE CLASS1$104K$104K
  • ARTS / WHOLE CLASS1$104K$104K
  • DANCE ALL OTHER / WHOLE CLASS1$104K$104K
  • K / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$104K$104K
  • LITERACY / WHOLE CLASS1$104K$104K
  • MATH / WHOLE CLASS1$104K$104K
  • 2, 3 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$21K$21K
  • LIBRARY / WHOLE CLASS0—$17K
Support staff29$80K$2.3M
  • School Aides and Other Support Staff3$103K$308K
  • PRE-K4$62K$248K
  • IEP-HEALTH5$49K$247K
  • SETSS / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$104K$208K
  • School Psychologist Mandated Services1$175K$175K
  • IEP-CRISIS MANAGEMENT(CIT)3$45K$134K
  • SPEECH / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$64K$129K
  • Guidance Counselor1$127K$127K
  • School Social Worker1$120K$120K
  • School Social Workers Mandated Services1$120K$120K
  • School Secretary1$96K$96K
  • PHYSICAL THERAPY / PULL-OUT -all students1$92K$92K
  • OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY / PUSH IN/PULL OUT1$91K$91K
  • DC 37 Para More Than 20 Hrs0—$90K
  • PARENT COORDINATOR1$50K$50K
  • IEP-ALTERNATE PLACEMENT1$45K$45K
  • Sub Assigned - Psychologist In Training1$26K$26K
Programs and extra time$1.1M
  • Absence Coverage$576K
  • People Working Partial Year$215K
  • AFTER/BEFORE SCHOOL STUDENT PROGRAMS$211K
  • IEP-HEALTH$90K
Supplies and services$655K
  • Supplies - General$340K
  • Non-Contractual Services$67K
  • Educational Consultants$58K
  • Maintenance Gen Repairs & Operation Infrastructure$45K
  • Curriculum & Staff Development Contracts$35K
  • Furniture Object 300$31K
  • Textbooks$23K
  • Summer Non-Professional 016$16K
  • Equipment - General$15K
  • School Funded Copier$8,736
  • Professional Services Other$4,347
  • Educational Software$3,683
  • Data Processing Repair - Contractual$3,574
  • Library Books$2,444
  • Office Temp Services - Contractual$2,283
Total71$125K$8.8M

Location & commute

Where the school is and how to get there.

Loading map…

Data sources

Sources cited on this page.

  1. 3.NYC DOE School Survey: Parent, teacher, and student survey results.
  2. 4.NYC DOE Demographic Snapshot: Enrollment and demographic breakdowns.
  3. 7.NYSED School Report Card: Teacher experience, certification, and pupil-teacher ratio.
  4. 8.NYSED Expenditures per Pupil: All-in spending per school and per student.
  5. 9.NYC DOE Galaxy Budget Summary: School-managed budget, staffing lines, and category totals.