
P.S. 005 Ellen Lurie
- 3703 TENTH AVENUE, Manhattan
- Grades K-5
- Christophe Anest, Principal
- 212-567-8109
- ps005m.org
About
P.S. 005 Ellen Lurie serves students in grades K-5 with an enrollment of 344. The school has a high percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch at 97.0%. It also serves a significant English Language Learner population at 49.0%, which is well above the citywide 75th percentile of 26.0%. Additionally, 36.0% of students have Individualized Education Programs, well above the citywide 75th percentile of 29.0%. In elementary state tests, 29.0% of students demonstrated ELA proficiency, which is below the citywide 25th percentile of 41.2%. Meanwhile, 39.0% demonstrated math proficiency, which is at the citywide 25th percentile of 39.0%. The school reports a 0.0% suspension rate. In the 2025-2026 DOE School Survey, parents expressed high satisfaction, with 97% satisfied with their child's education and 99% reporting their child is safe. Parents also reported strong relationships, with 96% feeling respected by teachers and 98% trusting the principal. The school's relationships with families are rated "Excellent," and safety and school climate are rated "Good," though instruction and performance are rated "Fair." The school offers Pre-K and Kindergarten Spanish Dual Language programs.
Sources (5)
- NYC DOE Location Code Generating and Management System (LCGMS) · 2026-27 (export of 2026-08-22)
- NYC DOE School Quality Reports and Snapshot, 2024-25 · 2024-25
- New York State Education Department School Report Card · 2024-25
- NYC School Survey (parent and student responses) · 2025-26
- MySchools admissions directory, 2025-26 cycle · 2025-26 admissions cycle
Academics
State test proficiency rates and acceleration.
ELA proficiency
29%
Math proficiency
39%
Proficiency rates are from the Grade 3–8 NYS state test (school-level).
Attendance rate
96%
Avg class size (general ed)
18.31
Avg class size (ICT)
19.33
Average class size by classroom setting: general education vs. ICT (Integrated Co-Teaching, where general- and special-education students learn together with two teachers). NYC DOE Class Size Report, 2021–22.
Community & climate
Demographics, attendance, school survey results, and DOE quality ratings.
Quality signals
DOE quality-rating labels are skewed across the system; read them relative to the citywide distribution in our methodology.
NYC School Survey, 2025-26
Parent survey · overall positive
95%90% response rate
Teacher survey · overall positive
85%95% response rate
Survey topics, 2025-26
Safety95%city 93%
- Teachers · My students are safe…outside around this school. [Elementary only].90%
- Teachers · My students are safe…traveling between home and this school. [Elementary only].90%
- Teachers · My students are safe…in the hallways, bathrooms, locker rooms, and cafeteria of this school. [Elementary only].98%
- Teachers · My students are safe…in my class(es). [Elementary only].100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 93% citywide.
Bullying prevention73%city 65%
- Teachers · At this school students harass, bully, or intimidate other students.73%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (73%) is their average, vs 65% citywide.
Emotional support87%city 84%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…help students develop the skills they need to complete challenging coursework despite obstacles?86%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…tell their students they believe they can achieve high academic standards?92%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…teach students how to advocate for themselves?88%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…recognize disruptive behavior as social-emotional learning opportunities?82%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…have access to school-based supports to assist in behavioral/emotional escalations?87%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (87%) is their average, vs 84% citywide.
Academic expectations89%city 89%
- Teachers · In this school, the staff believes that all students can learn, including Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs), Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs), and students with disabilities.98%
- Teachers · This school has well-defined learning expectations for all students.96%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…have to work hard to do well?73%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (89%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.
College & career guidance77%city 90%
- Teachers · It’s a priority at this school that adults…provide students with opportunities to learn about different career paths. [Elementary/Middle Only].77%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (77%) is their average, vs 90% citywide.
Family outreach97%city 95%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers understand families' challenges and concerns.100%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers work closely with families to meet students' needs.100%
- Teachers · At this school…staff regularly communicate with families about how they can help students learn.100%
- Teachers · At this school…school staff value families' race, ethnicity, culture, family structure, and background.100%
- Parents · School staff regularly communicate with me about how I can help my child learn.93%
- Parents · Teachers work closely with me to meet my child's needs.93%
- Parents · My child's school communicates with me in a language that I can understand.97%
- Parents · I am greeted warmly when I contact or visit the school.96%
- Parents · My child's school will make me aware if there are any concerns about my child’s social or emotional well-being.97%
- Parents · If I suspect my child needs additional learning supports and services, I know the next steps to get support at my school.93%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 95% citywide.
Parent–teacher trust96%city 96%
- Parents · I feel respected by my child's teachers.96%
- Parents · Staff at this school work hard to build trusting relationships with parents/guardians like me.95%
- Parents · My child's teachers treat me as a partner in educating my child.96%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Show all survey topicsShow fewer
Instruction and Performance
Early Childhood Instruction97%city 94%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…meet the needs of the children in my classroom. [Early childhood].92%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…develop and facilitate intentional learning experiences grounded in the developmentally appropriate practices and play-based learning experiences emphasized in New York State Prekindergarten Learning Standards (NYSPLS) and/or Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework (ELOF). [Early childhood].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…help children engage with books and materials, or in other learning activities reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Early childhood].100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.
Family Satisfaction with Child's Education95%city 94%
- Parents · My child is progressing in reading the way I would expect.91%
- Parents · My child is progressing in math the way I would expect.93%
- Parents · My child's school helps me understand what grade-level schoolwork looks like.95%
- Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The education my child has received this year.97%
- Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The overall quality of my child's teachers this year.97%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.
Cultural Awareness and Inclusive Classroom Instruction92%city 92%
- Teachers · I am able to...receive support around how to incorporate students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds in my practice.92%
- Teachers · I am able to...appropriately modify instructional activities and materials to meet the developmental needs and learning interests of all my students.90%
- Teachers · I am able to...ensure instruction represents multiple perspectives, cultures, and backgrounds.92%
- Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple races and ethnicities.94%
- Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations.95%
- Teachers · I am able to...design instruction that is responsive to students’ needs (e.g. Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs) or Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs) proficiency and students with disabilities).92%
- Teachers · I am able to...apply my knowledge of parents' various cultural backgrounds when collaborating with them regarding their child's educational progress.96%
- Teachers · I am able to...develop appropriate Individualized Education Programs for my students with disabilities.96%
- Teachers · I am able to...monitor progress on Individualized Education Program goals for my students with disabilities.98%
- Teachers · I am able to...distinguish linguistic/cultural differences from learning difficulties.98%
- Teachers · I have conversations about race and racism at my school that help me examine my own beliefs around identity.73%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (92%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.
IEP Service Satisfaction92%city 91%
- Parents · I am satisfied with the educational planning and Individualized Education Program (IEP) development process at this school. [Families of students with IEPs].92%
- Parents · At this school, my child receives what they need to achieve their Individualized Education Program (IEP) goal(s). [Families of students with IEPs].92%
- Parents · This school offers a wide enough variety of activities and services (including specialized programs, related services and assistive and adaptive technologies where appropriate) to help improve outcomes for my child. [Families of students with IEPs].93%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (92%) is their average, vs 91% citywide.
Strong Core Instruction76%city 93%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [Social Studies].78%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Social Studies].78%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Social Studies].56%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Social Studies].78%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [Social Studies].75%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [ELA].80%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [ELA].73%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [ELA].73%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [ELA].73%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [ELA].73%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Math].86%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Math].71%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Math].71%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [Math].82%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [English as a New Language (ENL)].86%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [English as a New Language (ENL)].86%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [English as a New Language (ENL)].71%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [English as a New Language (ENL)].86%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (76%) is their average, vs 93% citywide.
Classroom Behavior67%city 68%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…listen carefully when the teacher gives directions?57%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…follow the rules in class?88%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…respond to challenging questions in class?46%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…do their work when they are supposed to?76%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (67%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.
Quality of Student Discussion63%city 68%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…build on each other’s ideas during class discussions?59%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…use data or text references to support their ideas?61%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…show that they respect each other’s ideas?71%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…provide constructive feedback to their peers/teachers?51%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…participate in class discussions at some point?75%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (63%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.
Safety and School Climate
Inclusive Learning Environment98%city 96%
- Teachers · At this school, students with disabilities are included in all school activities.96%
- Teachers · This school educates students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment appropriate.94%
- Teachers · School staff treat students of different genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations equally.100%
- Teachers · School staff treat students of different races, cultures, or backgrounds equally.100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (98%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Inclusive Leadership97%city 96%
- Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…puts decisions made with families into action.98%
- Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…works to create a sense of community in the school.96%
- Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…ensures families are comfortable communicating with the school.97%
- Parents · Language translation and interpretation are readily available to me at all family events at my child’s school.97%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Conflict Resolution94%city 91%
- Teachers · Behavioral supports are applied equitably to children in my school/program. [Birth-5].100%
- Teachers · Conflicts are resolved fairly in my school.88%
- Parents · Conflicts are resolved fairly at my child’s school. [Grades K-5].93%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 91% citywide.
Instructional Leadership93%city 89%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...makes clear to the staff their expectations for meeting instructional goals.98%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...understands how children learn.94%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...sets high standards for student learning.98%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…supports teachers in implementing what they have learned in professional development.88%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…carefully tracks student academic progress.96%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…knows what’s going on in my classes.90%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…provides teachers with formative feedback to improve practice.88%
- Teachers · The principal/school leader at this school...participates in instructional planning with teams of teachers.88%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.
Teacher-Principal Trust89%city 86%
- Teachers · I feel respected by the principal/program leader at this school.90%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.90%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader has confidence in the expertise of the teachers at this school.90%
- Teachers · I trust the principal/program leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).88%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader looks out for the personal welfare of the staff members.94%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader places the needs of children ahead of personal interests.90%
- Teachers · The principal and assistant principals function as a cohesive unit.84%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (89%) is their average, vs 86% citywide.
Program Coherence89%city 85%
- Teachers · At this school…curriculum, instruction, and learning materials are well coordinated across the different grade levels at this school.88%
- Teachers · At this school…once we start a new program, we follow up to make sure that it’s working.90%
- Teachers · At this school…it is clear how all of the programs offered are connected to our school’s instructional vision.90%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (89%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.
School Commitment89%city 85%
- Teachers · I usually look forward to each working day at this school.88%
- Teachers · I would recommend this school to parents/guardians seeking a place for their child.88%
- Teachers · I would recommend this school to other teachers as a place to work.92%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (89%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.
Teacher-Teacher Trust88%city 88%
- Teachers · Teachers in this school trust each other.86%
- Teachers · It's OK in this school to discuss feelings, worries, and frustrations with other teachers.88%
- Teachers · I feel respected by other teachers at this school.90%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.
Peer Collaboration87%city 88%
- Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader, teachers, and staff collaborate to make this school run effectively.86%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers design instructional programs (e.g. lessons, units) together.90%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers make a conscious effort to coordinate their teaching with instruction at other grade levels.84%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (87%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.
Quality of Professional Development82%city 85%
- Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...included enough time to think carefully about, try, and evaluate new ideas.82%
- Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...Included opportunities to engage in inquiry-based, professional collaboration with peers and/or mentors from other schools.80%
- Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...directly related to my students’ needs.84%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (82%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.
Innovation and Collective Responsibility79%city 81%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…help build a welcoming school environment in the entire school, not just their classroom?81%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are actively trying to improve their teaching?85%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…take responsibility for improving the school?76%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are eager to try new ideas?67%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…feel responsible that all students learn?88%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (79%) is their average, vs 81% citywide.
Teacher Influence61%city 68%
- Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader encourages feedback through regular meetings with families and teacher leaders.94%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...hiring new professional personnel?41%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...planning how discretionary school funds should be used?41%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...selecting instructional materials and/or curriculum used in classrooms?51%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...setting standards for student behavior?80%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (61%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.
Relationships with Families
Two-Way Communication100%city 98%
- Teachers · At this school/program, teachers incorporate feedback from families into supporting children in the program. [Birth-5].100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (100%) is their average, vs 98% citywide.
Strong Relationships100%city 98%
- Teachers · It is a priority at this school/program that we establish, model, and reinforce expectations for respectful and trusting relationships among children, families, and all staff. [Birth-5].100%
- Teachers · At the beginning of the school year, teachers support children in adjusting to this school/program. [Birth-5].100%
- Parents · I feel good about the way that my child’s teachers helped my child adjust to their program. [Birth-5].99%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (100%) is their average, vs 98% citywide.
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Teacher99%city 97%
- Teachers · At this school/program, teachers let families know that they can make a difference in their child's learning and development. [Birth-5].100%
- Parents · My child’s teachers give me helpful ideas about how I can support my child’s learning and development. [Birth-5].100%
- Parents · My child’s teachers let me know that I can make a difference in my child’s learning. [Birth-5].98%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (99%) is their average, vs 97% citywide.
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Advocate98%city 94%
- Teachers · It is a priority at this school/program that staff help families support their child’s transition to the next age-group. [Birth-5].100%
- Teachers · It is a priority at this school/program that staff provide families with information about the annual application/enrollment process. [Birth-5].100%
- Parents · Someone at my child's program has helped me consider which schools or programs would be best for my child for next school/program year. [Birth-5].93%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (98%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.
Parent-Principal Trust98%city 96%
- Parents · I feel respected by my child's principal/school leader.98%
- Parents · I trust the principal/school leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).98%
- Parents · The principal/school leader is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.97%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (98%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Parent Involvement in School95%city 92%
- Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…communicated with your child's teachers about your child's performance?95%
- Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…seen your child’s projects, artwork, homework, tests, or quizzes?94%
- Parents · I know how to contact the Parent Coordinator at my child’s school.95%
- Parents · During the school year, have you...attended a school meeting, school event, or parent-teacher conference (virtually or in-person)?94%
- Parents · My child’s teachers incorporate my feedback into how they support my child. [Birth-5].96%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.
School Description
School Facilities and Services91%city 88%
- Teachers · This school is kept clean.88%
- Teachers · This school is kept in good physical condition.90%
- Teachers · Physical repairs to the school building are completed in a timely manner.84%
- Parents · This school is kept clean.99%
- Parents · This school is kept in good physical condition.98%
- Parents · My child's school provides me information about transportation options (e.g. Metrocard and busing).87%
- Parents · I am satisfied with my child’s school bus transportation service this year.88%
- Parents · I am satisfied with the meal options provided at my child’s school.94%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (91%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.
Overall positive % is averaged across every Pos/Neg survey question per respondent group (school year 2025-2026). Survey topics are the DOE’s framework measures (each the average favorable response across its questions; expand a topic to see them and the citywide average); the dimension scores themselves are no longer in the public data file.[3]
Operational health
Attendance
96%
Chronic absenteeism
42%
Suspension rate
0%
Teachers[7]
Teachers with 4+ years' experience
82%
Students per teacher
9:1
Teaching out of certification
13%
Teacher experience and certification from the NYSED School Report Card (2024–25); students per teacher = enrollment ÷ reported teachers. Fewer than 4 years counts as inexperienced.
Student body
Race / ethnicity[4]
- Black 9%
- Hispanic 89%
- White 1%
- Multiracial 1%
School-level totals; may not sum to 100% due to rounding and small subgroup suppression.
Gender[4]
- Female 44%
- Male 56%
Female / male shares as published by the DOE; other gender identities aren’t reported in the source data.
Enrollment
344
Economic Need Index
—
Free / reduced lunch
97%
English learners
49%
Students with IEPs
36%
Admissions
2 programs. Each has its own admissions method, and each track within a program has its own seats, demand, and priority order.
Kindergarten (06M005)
Program code 06M005KG · Cycle 2024-2025
33 applicants · 50 seats last year; every priority group with applicants received offers.
| priority group | Seats | Applicants | Applications / seat |
|---|---|---|---|
| General education | 50 | 33 | — |
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the zone. | 15 | 15 | 1.00 |
↳ Students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live in the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the district. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live outside the district. | — | — | — |
Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).
Kindergarten Spanish Dual Language (06M005)
Program code 06M005SP · Cycle 2024-2025
14 applicants · 25 seats last year.
| priority group | Seats | Applicants | Applications / seat |
|---|---|---|---|
| General education | 25 | 14 | — |
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the zone. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live in the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the district. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live outside the district. | — | — | — |
Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).
How to read Applications / seat and where the outlook buckets come from is explained in our methodology.
Spending
Total spend
$18.4MStudents: 433
70th percentile citywide
School-managed budget
$11.8MPositions: 82
77th percentile citywide
Total spend per student
$42,592
83rd percentile citywide · city median $33,357
Staffing costs
Principal’s salary
$203K
50th percentile citywide
Principal and assistant principals
$522KPositions: 3
59th percentile citywide
Teaching staff
$6.4MPositions: 48
77th percentile citywide
Where the school-managed budget goes
These five categories add up to the school-managed budget. They do not include the centrally-paid costs in total spend.
Leadership3$174K$522K
- HEAD OF SCHOOL1$203K$203K
- ASST HEAD OF SCHOOL1$168K$168K
- INTERIM ACTING - ASST. PRINCIPAL1$152K$152K
Teachers48$133K$6.4M
- Pre K / WHOLE CLASS3$167K$500K
- Pre K, 3-K / WHOLE CLASS3$167K$500K
- K / ICT - Special Ed Teacher3$149K$447K
- 1 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher3$126K$378K
- 5 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher2$161K$323K
- 2 / ICT - General Ed Teacher2$135K$270K
- 4 / WHOLE CLASS2$122K$243K
- 3 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher2$120K$241K
- 3,4,5 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED2$114K$228K
- 5 / WHOLE CLASS2$114K$228K
- K / ICT - General Ed Teacher2$114K$228K
- SCIENCE - GENERAL SCIENCE / WHOLE CLASS2$114K$228K
- 3 / WHOLE CLASS2$95K$190K
- COMPUTER LAB / WHOLE CLASS1$167K$167K
- Pre K,3-K / 8:1:21$167K$167K
- 1 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$157K$157K
- ARTS / WHOLE CLASS1$146K$146K
- PHYSICAL EDUCATION / WHOLE CLASS1$146K$146K
- 2 / WHOLE CLASS1$136K$136K
- PHYSICAL EDUCATION / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$135K$135K
- 1 / WHOLE CLASS1$114K$114K
- 2 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$114K$114K
- 4 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$114K$114K
- 5 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$114K$114K
- ESL / PUSH IN/PULL OUT1$114K$114K
- K / 8:1:1 4R1$114K$114K
- K, 1, 2 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$114K$114K
- 3 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$114K$114K
- MUSIC / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$109K$109K
- 1 / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$100K$100K
- K / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$100K$100K
- SELF CONTAINED SP ED / WHOLE CLASS0—$91K
- K,1 / SUPPLEMENTARY0—$28K
Support staff29$84K$2.4M
- SPEECH / PUSH IN/PULL OUT5$97K$483K
- PRE-K5$78K$388K
- CLASSROOM - Special Ed5$53K$264K
- IEP-CRISIS MANAGEMENT(CIT)6$38K$229K
- School Psychologist1$175K$175K
- School Aides and Other Support Staff0—$152K
- OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$73K$146K
- Guidance Counselor1$121K$121K
- School Social Worker1$120K$120K
- School Secretary1$82K$82K
- Sub Assigned - Psychologist In Training1$64K$64K
- F-Status - School Social Worker0—$59K
- PARENT COORDINATOR1$58K$58K
- Attendance0—$48K
- DC 37 Para More Than 20 Hrs0—$36K
Programs and extra time$1.7M
- AFTER/BEFORE SCHOOL STUDENT PROGRAMS$346K
- Absence Coverage$341K
- People Working Partial Year$243K
- IEP-HEALTH$192K
- IEP-ALTERNATE PLACEMENT$175K
- LITERACY COACH1$153K$153K
- IEP-CRISIS MANAGEMENT(CIT)$117K
- MATH COACH1$114K$114K
- Professional Development$20K
- 504$20K
- PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT$16K
- SPECIAL ED INSTRUCTIONAL PGMS$911
Supplies and services$713K
- Supplies - General$280K
- Furniture Object 300$88K
- Educational Consultants$67K
- Curriculum & Staff Development Contracts$59K
- Equipment - General$56K
- Educational Software$54K
- Professional Services Other$45K
- Non-Contractual Services$29K
- Data Processing Repair - Contractual$22K
- Office Temp Services - Contractual$3,672
- School Funded Copier$3,636
- Library Books$2,150
- Transportation of Staff - Non-Contract$2,000
Location & commute
Where the school is and how to get there.