
P.S. 128 Audubon
- 560 WEST 169 STREET, Manhattan
- Grades PK-5
- CARY PANTALEON, Principal
- 212-927-0607
- ps128m.org
About
P.S. 128 Audubon serves students from Pre-Kindergarten through 5th grade. The school's student population includes 31.0% English Language Learners, which is well above the citywide 75th percentile, and an Economic Need Index of 87.0%, which is above the citywide median. In terms of academic performance, 48.0% of students demonstrated proficiency in ELA and 41.0% in Math, both falling below the citywide median for elementary schools. The school maintains a very low suspension rate of 0.0%. Parent feedback from the 2025-2026 DOE School Survey indicates strong satisfaction, with 97.0% of responding parents reporting their child is safe and 97.0% satisfied with their child's education. Additionally, 96.0% of parents surveyed felt respected by the principal/school leader and 96.0% reported that their child's teachers treat them as a partner. The school offers a Spanish Dual Language program for Pre-K and Kindergarten. The average class size is 16.82 students.
Sources (6)
- NYC DOE Location Code Generating and Management System (LCGMS) · 2026-27 (export of 2026-08-22)
- NYC DOE School Quality Reports and Snapshot, 2024-25 · 2024-25
- New York State Education Department School Report Card · 2024-25
- NYC School Survey (parent and student responses) · 2025-26
- MySchools admissions directory, 2025-26 cycle · 2025-26 admissions cycle
- NYC Open Data: 2021-2022 Average Class Size by School · 2021-22
Academics
Coursework, class size, and academic context.
Attendance rate
96%
Avg class size (general ed)
16.82
Avg class size (ICT)
—
Average class size by classroom setting: general education vs. ICT (Integrated Co-Teaching, where general- and special-education students learn together with two teachers). NYC DOE Class Size Report, 2021–22.
Community & climate
Demographics, attendance, school survey results, and DOE quality ratings.
Quality signals
DOE quality-rating labels are skewed across the system; read them relative to the citywide distribution in our methodology.
NYC School Survey, 2025-26
Parent survey · overall positive
94%97% response rate
Teacher survey · overall positive
91%98% response rate
Survey topics, 2025-26
Safety90%city 93%
- Teachers · My students are safe…outside around this school. [Elementary only].79%
- Teachers · My students are safe…traveling between home and this school. [Elementary only].82%
- Teachers · My students are safe…in the hallways, bathrooms, locker rooms, and cafeteria of this school. [Elementary only].100%
- Teachers · My students are safe…in my class(es). [Elementary only].100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (90%) is their average, vs 93% citywide.
Bullying prevention86%city 65%
- Teachers · At this school students harass, bully, or intimidate other students.86%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (86%) is their average, vs 65% citywide.
Emotional support86%city 84%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…help students develop the skills they need to complete challenging coursework despite obstacles?85%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…tell their students they believe they can achieve high academic standards?94%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…teach students how to advocate for themselves?85%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…recognize disruptive behavior as social-emotional learning opportunities?83%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…have access to school-based supports to assist in behavioral/emotional escalations?81%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (86%) is their average, vs 84% citywide.
Academic expectations94%city 89%
- Teachers · In this school, the staff believes that all students can learn, including Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs), Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs), and students with disabilities.98%
- Teachers · This school has well-defined learning expectations for all students.98%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…have to work hard to do well?85%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.
College & career guidance94%city 90%
- Teachers · It’s a priority at this school that adults…provide students with opportunities to learn about different career paths. [Elementary/Middle Only].94%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 90% citywide.
Family outreach97%city 95%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers understand families' challenges and concerns.100%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers work closely with families to meet students' needs.100%
- Teachers · At this school…staff regularly communicate with families about how they can help students learn.98%
- Teachers · At this school…school staff value families' race, ethnicity, culture, family structure, and background.100%
- Parents · School staff regularly communicate with me about how I can help my child learn.91%
- Parents · Teachers work closely with me to meet my child's needs.94%
- Parents · My child's school communicates with me in a language that I can understand.96%
- Parents · I am greeted warmly when I contact or visit the school.96%
- Parents · My child's school will make me aware if there are any concerns about my child’s social or emotional well-being.96%
- Parents · If I suspect my child needs additional learning supports and services, I know the next steps to get support at my school.94%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 95% citywide.
Parent–teacher trust95%city 96%
- Parents · I feel respected by my child's teachers.95%
- Parents · Staff at this school work hard to build trusting relationships with parents/guardians like me.95%
- Parents · My child's teachers treat me as a partner in educating my child.96%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Show all survey topicsShow fewer
Instruction and Performance
Cultural Awareness and Inclusive Classroom Instruction98%city 92%
- Teachers · I am able to...receive support around how to incorporate students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds in my practice.96%
- Teachers · I am able to...appropriately modify instructional activities and materials to meet the developmental needs and learning interests of all my students.100%
- Teachers · I am able to...ensure instruction represents multiple perspectives, cultures, and backgrounds.98%
- Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple races and ethnicities.100%
- Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations.98%
- Teachers · I am able to...design instruction that is responsive to students’ needs (e.g. Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs) or Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs) proficiency and students with disabilities).100%
- Teachers · I am able to...apply my knowledge of parents' various cultural backgrounds when collaborating with them regarding their child's educational progress.98%
- Teachers · I am able to...develop appropriate Individualized Education Programs for my students with disabilities.100%
- Teachers · I am able to...monitor progress on Individualized Education Program goals for my students with disabilities.100%
- Teachers · I am able to...distinguish linguistic/cultural differences from learning difficulties.100%
- Teachers · I have conversations about race and racism at my school that help me examine my own beliefs around identity.83%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (98%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.
Family Satisfaction with Child's Education95%city 94%
- Parents · My child is progressing in reading the way I would expect.93%
- Parents · My child is progressing in math the way I would expect.94%
- Parents · My child's school helps me understand what grade-level schoolwork looks like.93%
- Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The education my child has received this year.97%
- Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The overall quality of my child's teachers this year.98%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.
Early Childhood Instruction93%city 94%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…meet the needs of the children in my classroom. [Early childhood].90%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…develop and facilitate intentional learning experiences grounded in the developmentally appropriate practices and play-based learning experiences emphasized in New York State Prekindergarten Learning Standards (NYSPLS) and/or Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework (ELOF). [Early childhood].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…help children engage with books and materials, or in other learning activities reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Early childhood].90%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.
Strong Core Instruction93%city 92%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [Social Studies].83%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Social Studies].92%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Social Studies].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Social Studies].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [Social Studies].91%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [Science].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Science].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Science].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Science].93%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…creating coherent progressions within the standards from previous grades to current grade to build onto previous learning. [Science].86%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [ELA].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [ELA].95%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [ELA].95%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [ELA].91%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [ELA].91%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Math].92%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Math].93%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Math].93%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [Math].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [English as a New Language (ENL)].86%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [English as a New Language (ENL)].86%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [English as a New Language (ENL)].86%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [English as a New Language (ENL)].86%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.
IEP Service Satisfaction91%city 91%
- Parents · I am satisfied with the educational planning and Individualized Education Program (IEP) development process at this school. [Families of students with IEPs].92%
- Parents · At this school, my child receives what they need to achieve their Individualized Education Program (IEP) goal(s). [Families of students with IEPs].92%
- Parents · This school offers a wide enough variety of activities and services (including specialized programs, related services and assistive and adaptive technologies where appropriate) to help improve outcomes for my child. [Families of students with IEPs].90%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (91%) is their average, vs 91% citywide.
Classroom Behavior78%city 68%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…listen carefully when the teacher gives directions?78%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…follow the rules in class?88%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…respond to challenging questions in class?67%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…do their work when they are supposed to?78%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (78%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.
Quality of Student Discussion72%city 68%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…build on each other’s ideas during class discussions?75%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…use data or text references to support their ideas?63%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…show that they respect each other’s ideas?79%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…provide constructive feedback to their peers/teachers?68%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…participate in class discussions at some point?77%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (72%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.
Safety and School Climate
Inclusive Learning Environment98%city 96%
- Teachers · At this school, students with disabilities are included in all school activities.96%
- Teachers · This school educates students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment appropriate.98%
- Teachers · School staff treat students of different genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations equally.98%
- Teachers · School staff treat students of different races, cultures, or backgrounds equally.98%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (98%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Inclusive Leadership96%city 96%
- Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…puts decisions made with families into action.95%
- Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…works to create a sense of community in the school.96%
- Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…ensures families are comfortable communicating with the school.96%
- Parents · Language translation and interpretation are readily available to me at all family events at my child’s school.98%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Conflict Resolution96%city 91%
- Teachers · Behavioral supports are applied equitably to children in my school/program. [Birth-5].100%
- Teachers · Conflicts are resolved fairly in my school.94%
- Parents · Conflicts are resolved fairly at my child’s school. [Grades K-5].94%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 91% citywide.
Peer Collaboration96%city 88%
- Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader, teachers, and staff collaborate to make this school run effectively.96%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers design instructional programs (e.g. lessons, units) together.96%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers make a conscious effort to coordinate their teaching with instruction at other grade levels.96%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.
Program Coherence93%city 85%
- Teachers · At this school…curriculum, instruction, and learning materials are well coordinated across the different grade levels at this school.93%
- Teachers · At this school…once we start a new program, we follow up to make sure that it’s working.90%
- Teachers · At this school…it is clear how all of the programs offered are connected to our school’s instructional vision.96%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.
Instructional Leadership93%city 89%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...makes clear to the staff their expectations for meeting instructional goals.94%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...understands how children learn.94%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...sets high standards for student learning.98%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…supports teachers in implementing what they have learned in professional development.94%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…carefully tracks student academic progress.96%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…knows what’s going on in my classes.83%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…provides teachers with formative feedback to improve practice.96%
- Teachers · The principal/school leader at this school...participates in instructional planning with teams of teachers.85%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.
School Commitment91%city 85%
- Teachers · I usually look forward to each working day at this school.84%
- Teachers · I would recommend this school to parents/guardians seeking a place for their child.98%
- Teachers · I would recommend this school to other teachers as a place to work.90%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (91%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.
Quality of Professional Development89%city 85%
- Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...included enough time to think carefully about, try, and evaluate new ideas.85%
- Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...Included opportunities to engage in inquiry-based, professional collaboration with peers and/or mentors from other schools.88%
- Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...directly related to my students’ needs.94%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (89%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.
Teacher-Principal Trust88%city 86%
- Teachers · I feel respected by the principal/program leader at this school.85%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.90%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader has confidence in the expertise of the teachers at this school.88%
- Teachers · I trust the principal/program leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).85%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader looks out for the personal welfare of the staff members.89%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader places the needs of children ahead of personal interests.96%
- Teachers · The principal and assistant principals function as a cohesive unit.85%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 86% citywide.
Teacher-Teacher Trust88%city 88%
- Teachers · Teachers in this school trust each other.84%
- Teachers · It's OK in this school to discuss feelings, worries, and frustrations with other teachers.83%
- Teachers · I feel respected by other teachers at this school.96%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.
Innovation and Collective Responsibility86%city 81%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…help build a welcoming school environment in the entire school, not just their classroom?92%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are actively trying to improve their teaching?90%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…take responsibility for improving the school?84%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are eager to try new ideas?76%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…feel responsible that all students learn?88%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (86%) is their average, vs 81% citywide.
Teacher Influence64%city 68%
- Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader encourages feedback through regular meetings with families and teacher leaders.98%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...hiring new professional personnel?47%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...planning how discretionary school funds should be used?48%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...selecting instructional materials and/or curriculum used in classrooms?52%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...setting standards for student behavior?73%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (64%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.
Relationships with Families
Two-Way Communication100%city 98%
- Teachers · At this school/program, teachers incorporate feedback from families into supporting children in the program. [Birth-5].100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (100%) is their average, vs 98% citywide.
Strong Relationships98%city 98%
- Teachers · It is a priority at this school/program that we establish, model, and reinforce expectations for respectful and trusting relationships among children, families, and all staff. [Birth-5].100%
- Teachers · At the beginning of the school year, teachers support children in adjusting to this school/program. [Birth-5].100%
- Parents · I feel good about the way that my child’s teachers helped my child adjust to their program. [Birth-5].93%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (98%) is their average, vs 98% citywide.
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Teacher97%city 97%
- Teachers · At this school/program, teachers let families know that they can make a difference in their child's learning and development. [Birth-5].100%
- Parents · My child’s teachers give me helpful ideas about how I can support my child’s learning and development. [Birth-5].96%
- Parents · My child’s teachers let me know that I can make a difference in my child’s learning. [Birth-5].95%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 97% citywide.
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Advocate96%city 94%
- Teachers · It is a priority at this school/program that staff help families support their child’s transition to the next age-group. [Birth-5].100%
- Teachers · It is a priority at this school/program that staff provide families with information about the annual application/enrollment process. [Birth-5].100%
- Parents · Someone at my child's program has helped me consider which schools or programs would be best for my child for next school/program year. [Birth-5].89%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.
Parent-Principal Trust96%city 96%
- Parents · I feel respected by my child's principal/school leader.96%
- Parents · I trust the principal/school leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).96%
- Parents · The principal/school leader is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.96%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Parent Involvement in School95%city 92%
- Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…communicated with your child's teachers about your child's performance?95%
- Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…seen your child’s projects, artwork, homework, tests, or quizzes?97%
- Parents · I know how to contact the Parent Coordinator at my child’s school.94%
- Parents · During the school year, have you...attended a school meeting, school event, or parent-teacher conference (virtually or in-person)?93%
- Parents · My child’s teachers incorporate my feedback into how they support my child. [Birth-5].97%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.
School Description
School Facilities and Services93%city 88%
- Teachers · This school is kept clean.92%
- Teachers · This school is kept in good physical condition.100%
- Teachers · Physical repairs to the school building are completed in a timely manner.92%
- Parents · This school is kept clean.97%
- Parents · This school is kept in good physical condition.96%
- Parents · My child's school provides me information about transportation options (e.g. Metrocard and busing).85%
- Parents · I am satisfied with my child’s school bus transportation service this year.89%
- Parents · I am satisfied with the meal options provided at my child’s school.90%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.
Overall positive % is averaged across every Pos/Neg survey question per respondent group (school year 2025-2026). Survey topics are the DOE’s framework measures (each the average favorable response across its questions; expand a topic to see them and the citywide average); the dimension scores themselves are no longer in the public data file.[3]
Operational health
Attendance
96%
Chronic absenteeism
35%
Suspension rate
0%
Teachers[7]
Teachers with 4+ years' experience
84%
Students per teacher
9:1
Teaching out of certification
21%
Teacher experience and certification from the NYSED School Report Card (2024–25); students per teacher = enrollment ÷ reported teachers. Fewer than 4 years counts as inexperienced.
Student body
Race / ethnicity[4]
- Black 5%
- Hispanic 90%
- White 3%
- Multiracial 1%
School-level totals; may not sum to 100% due to rounding and small subgroup suppression.
Gender[4]
- Female 53%
- Male 47%
Female / male shares as published by the DOE; other gender identities aren’t reported in the source data.
Enrollment
377
Economic Need Index
87%
Free / reduced lunch
88%
English learners
31%
Students with IEPs
28%
Admissions
3 programs. Each has its own admissions method, and each track within a program has its own seats, demand, and priority order.
3-K - School Day
Program code 06M1283K · Cycle 2024-2025
46 applicants · 30 seats last year; offers ran out before reaching Other students who live in the district..
| priority group | Seats | Applicants | Applications / seat |
|---|---|---|---|
| General education | 30 | 46 | — |
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the zone. | 15 | 15 | 1.00 |
↳ Students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school. | 10 | 10 | 1.00 |
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the district. | 0 | 20 | — |
↳ All other applicants. | — | — | — |
Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).
Pre-K - School Day
Program code 06M128PK · Cycle 2024-2025
29 applicants · 36 seats last year; every priority group with applicants received offers.
| priority group | Seats | Applicants | Applications / seat |
|---|---|---|---|
| General education | 36 | 29 | — |
↳ Current students. | 15 | 15 | 1.00 |
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the zone. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the district. | — | — | — |
↳ All other applicants. | — | — | — |
Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).
Pre-K - Spanish Dual Language
Program code 06M128PKSP · Cycle 2024-2025
19 applicants · 36 seats last year; every priority group with applicants received offers.
| priority group | Seats | Applicants | Applications / seat |
|---|---|---|---|
| General education | 36 | 19 | — |
↳ Current students. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the zone. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the district. | 10 | 10 | 1.00 |
↳ Other students who live outside the district. | — | — | — |
↳ All other applicants. | — | — | — |
Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).
How to read Applications / seat and where the outlook buckets come from is explained in our methodology.
Spending
Total spend
$17.2MStudents: 445
65th percentile citywide
School-managed budget
$11.2MPositions: 80
74th percentile citywide
Total spend per student
$38,600
73rd percentile citywide · city median $33,357
Staffing costs
Principal’s salary
$198K
39th percentile citywide
Principal and assistant principals
$538KPositions: 3
65th percentile citywide
Teaching staff
$5.5MPositions: 38
69th percentile citywide
Where the school-managed budget goes
These five categories add up to the school-managed budget. They do not include the centrally-paid costs in total spend.
Leadership3$179K$538K
- HEAD OF SCHOOL1$198K$198K
- AP - ORGANIZATION1$185K$185K
- AP - SUPERVISION1$155K$155K
Teachers38$145K$5.5M
- Pre K / WHOLE CLASS3$175K$524K
- 5 / WHOLE CLASS3$156K$469K
- 4 / WHOLE CLASS3$143K$430K
- K / WHOLE CLASS3$130K$390K
- Pre K, 3-K / WHOLE CLASS2$175K$349K
- 4 / REDUCED CLASS SIZE2$147K$294K
- 2 / WHOLE CLASS2$147K$294K
- PHYSICAL EDUCATION / WHOLE CLASS2$131K$262K
- 1 / WHOLE CLASS2$120K$240K
- K, 1, 2 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED2$120K$240K
- 1 / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$175K$175K
- K / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$175K$175K
- Pre K / 8:1:21$175K$175K
- Pre K / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$175K$175K
- 5 / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$166K$166K
- 3 / WHOLE CLASS1$159K$159K
- SCIENCE - GENERAL SCIENCE / WHOLE CLASS1$154K$154K
- ARTS / 6:1:1 5R1$142K$142K
- MUSIC / WHOLE CLASS1$142K$142K
- COMPUTER / WHOLE CLASS1$131K$131K
- DANCE MODERN / WHOLE CLASS1$131K$131K
- 3, 4, 5 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$120K$120K
- K / 6:1:1 5R1$115K$115K
- 3, 4 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$70K$70K
Support staff38$88K$3.4M
- SPEECH / PUSH IN/PULL OUT5$115K$574K
- School Aides and Other Support Staff2$192K$383K
- SETSS / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$120K$240K
- CLASSROOM - Special Ed6$39K$234K
- OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$114K$228K
- PRE-K3$72K$216K
- IEP-HEALTH4$49K$194K
- INTERVENTION / PREVENTION / PUSH IN/PULL OUT1$150K$150K
- Guidance Counselor1$136K$136K
- IEP-CRISIS MANAGEMENT(CIT)3$43K$129K
- School Psychologist Mandated Services1$120K$120K
- School Social Workers Mandated Services1$120K$120K
- Board Certified Behavior Analyst / 6:1:1 5R1$120K$120K
- ESL / PUSH IN/PULL OUT1$120K$120K
- OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY / PULL-OUT -all students1$91K$91K
- PRE-K AUTISTIC SPECTRUM1$78K$78K
- School Secretary1$63K$63K
- PARENT COORDINATOR1$51K$51K
- 5041$45K$45K
- DC 37 Para More Than 20 Hrs0—$36K
- OUTREACH0—$31K
- Attendance0—$4,000
Programs and extra time$1.3M
- AFTER/BEFORE SCHOOL STUDENT PROGRAMS$504K
- Absence Coverage$479K
- LITERACY COACH1$120K$120K
- People Working Partial Year$101K
- IEP-CRISIS MANAGEMENT(CIT)$62K
- Not Available$35K
Supplies and services$465K
- Supplies - General$221K
- Non-Contractual Services$71K
- Educational Software$35K
- Educational Consultants$31K
- Professional Services Other$25K
- Curriculum & Staff Development Contracts$23K
- Summer Non-Professional 016$17K
- Internal DOE Services$16K
- School Funded Copier$9,188
- Furniture Object 300$5,000
- Transportation of Staff - Non-Contract$4,428
- Data Processing Repair - Contractual$3,687
- Library Books$2,356
- Overtime Admin$1,100
- Telephone and Other Communications$945
Location & commute
Where the school is and how to get there.