Pre-K–ElemSchool code (DBN) 10X310

P.S. 310 Marble Hill

260 W KINGSBRIDGE RD, Bronx
Grades PK-5
Josephine Luces Louison, Principal
718-796-9434
schools.nyc.gov

About

P.S. 310 Marble Hill serves students from Pre-Kindergarten through 5th grade in the Bronx. The school has an enrollment of 346 students, which is near the citywide 25th percentile. A high percentage of students, 96.0 percent, are eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, which is near the citywide 75th percentile. The school also serves a higher proportion of English Language Learners at 24.0 percent and students with Individualized Education Programs at 32.0 percent, both near the citywide 75th percentile. In Grade 3-8 state tests, 46.0 percent of students demonstrated ELA proficiency and 44.0 percent demonstrated math proficiency, both above the citywide 25th percentile. The school reports a 0.0 percent suspension rate. In the 2025-2026 DOE School Survey, parents expressed high satisfaction, with 95 percent stating they were satisfied with their child's education. A significant 96 percent of parents surveyed felt their child was safe at school, and 97 percent reported that School Safety Agents promote a safe and respectful environment. Parents also reported strong communication and respectful relationships with teachers and staff. The school offers zoned 3-K, Pre-K, and Kindergarten programs.

Sources (5)

NYC DOE Location Code Generating and Management System (LCGMS) · 2026-27 (export of 2026-08-22)
NYC DOE School Quality Reports and Snapshot, 2024-25 · 2024-25
New York State Education Department School Report Card · 2024-25
NYC School Survey (parent and student responses) · 2025-26
MySchools admissions directory, 2025-26 cycle · 2025-26 admissions cycle

Academics

Coursework, class size, and academic context.

3-K - School DayBalancedlow confidence

Kindergarten (10X310)Balancedlow confidence

Pre-K - School DayBalancedlow confidence

Attendance rate

96%

Avg class size (general ed)

19.06

Avg class size (ICT)

Average class size by classroom setting: general education vs. ICT (Integrated Co-Teaching, where general- and special-education students learn together with two teachers). NYC DOE Class Size Report, 2021–22.

Community & climate

Demographics, attendance, school survey results, and DOE quality ratings.

Quality signals

FacultyGoodAI-estimated

InstructionFair

Safety & climateFair

Family tiesGood

DOE quality-rating labels are skewed across the system; read them relative to the citywide distribution in our methodology.

NYC School Survey, 2025-26

Parent survey · overall positive

90%47% response rate

Teacher survey · overall positive

79%81% response rate

Survey topics, 2025-26

Safety82%city 93%

Teachers · My students are safe…outside around this school. [Elementary only].68%
Teachers · My students are safe…traveling between home and this school. [Elementary only].68%
Teachers · My students are safe…in the hallways, bathrooms, locker rooms, and cafeteria of this school. [Elementary only].94%
Teachers · My students are safe…in my class(es). [Elementary only].97%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (82%) is their average, vs 93% citywide.

Bullying prevention50%city 65%

Teachers · At this school students harass, bully, or intimidate other students.50%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (50%) is their average, vs 65% citywide.

Emotional support89%city 84%

Teachers · How many adults at this school…help students develop the skills they need to complete challenging coursework despite obstacles?95%
Teachers · How many adults at this school…tell their students they believe they can achieve high academic standards?100%
Teachers · How many adults at this school…teach students how to advocate for themselves?100%
Teachers · How many adults at this school…recognize disruptive behavior as social-emotional learning opportunities?94%
Teachers · How many adults at this school…have access to school-based supports to assist in behavioral/emotional escalations?58%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (89%) is their average, vs 84% citywide.

Academic expectations88%city 89%

Teachers · In this school, the staff believes that all students can learn, including Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs), Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs), and students with disabilities.97%
Teachers · This school has well-defined learning expectations for all students.95%
Teachers · How many students in your classes…have to work hard to do well?72%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.

College & career guidance88%city 90%

Teachers · It’s a priority at this school that adults…provide students with opportunities to learn about different career paths. [Elementary/Middle Only].88%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 90% citywide.

Family outreach94%city 95%

Teachers · At this school…teachers understand families' challenges and concerns.97%
Teachers · At this school…teachers work closely with families to meet students' needs.97%
Teachers · At this school…staff regularly communicate with families about how they can help students learn.97%
Teachers · At this school…school staff value families' race, ethnicity, culture, family structure, and background.97%
Parents · School staff regularly communicate with me about how I can help my child learn.91%
Parents · Teachers work closely with me to meet my child's needs.91%
Parents · My child's school communicates with me in a language that I can understand.96%
Parents · I am greeted warmly when I contact or visit the school.94%
Parents · My child's school will make me aware if there are any concerns about my child’s social or emotional well-being.94%
Parents · If I suspect my child needs additional learning supports and services, I know the next steps to get support at my school.86%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 95% citywide.

Parent–teacher trust95%city 96%

Parents · I feel respected by my child's teachers.96%
Parents · Staff at this school work hard to build trusting relationships with parents/guardians like me.94%
Parents · My child's teachers treat me as a partner in educating my child.94%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Show all survey topics

Instruction and Performance

Early Childhood Instruction94%city 94%

Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…meet the needs of the children in my classroom. [Early childhood].83%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…develop and facilitate intentional learning experiences grounded in the developmentally appropriate practices and play-based learning experiences emphasized in New York State Prekindergarten Learning Standards (NYSPLS) and/or Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework (ELOF). [Early childhood].100%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…help children engage with books and materials, or in other learning activities reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Early childhood].100%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.

Family Satisfaction with Child's Education91%city 94%

Parents · My child is progressing in reading the way I would expect.86%
Parents · My child is progressing in math the way I would expect.89%
Parents · My child's school helps me understand what grade-level schoolwork looks like.91%
Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The education my child has received this year.95%
Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The overall quality of my child's teachers this year.95%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (91%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.

Cultural Awareness and Inclusive Classroom Instruction88%city 92%

Teachers · I am able to...receive support around how to incorporate students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds in my practice.87%
Teachers · I am able to...appropriately modify instructional activities and materials to meet the developmental needs and learning interests of all my students.95%
Teachers · I am able to...ensure instruction represents multiple perspectives, cultures, and backgrounds.89%
Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple races and ethnicities.84%
Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations.77%
Teachers · I am able to...design instruction that is responsive to students’ needs (e.g. Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs) or Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs) proficiency and students with disabilities).92%
Teachers · I am able to...apply my knowledge of parents' various cultural backgrounds when collaborating with them regarding their child's educational progress.87%
Teachers · I am able to...develop appropriate Individualized Education Programs for my students with disabilities.100%
Teachers · I am able to...monitor progress on Individualized Education Program goals for my students with disabilities.94%
Teachers · I am able to...distinguish linguistic/cultural differences from learning difficulties.97%
Teachers · I have conversations about race and racism at my school that help me examine my own beliefs around identity.66%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.

Strong Core Instruction86%city 92%

Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [Social Studies].86%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Social Studies].86%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Social Studies].100%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Social Studies].100%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [Social Studies].86%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [Science].71%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Science].86%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Science].86%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Science].86%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…creating coherent progressions within the standards from previous grades to current grade to build onto previous learning. [Science].100%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [ELA].83%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [ELA].87%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [ELA].74%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [ELA].83%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [ELA].87%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Math].88%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Math].65%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Math].76%
Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [Math].94%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (86%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.

IEP Service Satisfaction85%city 91%

Parents · I am satisfied with the educational planning and Individualized Education Program (IEP) development process at this school. [Families of students with IEPs].88%
Parents · At this school, my child receives what they need to achieve their Individualized Education Program (IEP) goal(s). [Families of students with IEPs].86%
Parents · This school offers a wide enough variety of activities and services (including specialized programs, related services and assistive and adaptive technologies where appropriate) to help improve outcomes for my child. [Families of students with IEPs].80%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (85%) is their average, vs 91% citywide.

Quality of Student Discussion69%city 68%

Teachers · How many students in your classes…build on each other’s ideas during class discussions?66%
Teachers · How many students in your classes…use data or text references to support their ideas?68%
Teachers · How many students in your classes…show that they respect each other’s ideas?84%
Teachers · How many students in your classes…provide constructive feedback to their peers/teachers?47%
Teachers · How many students in your classes…participate in class discussions at some point?82%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (69%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.

Classroom Behavior69%city 68%

Teachers · How many students in your classes…listen carefully when the teacher gives directions?71%
Teachers · How many students in your classes…follow the rules in class?82%
Teachers · How many students in your classes…respond to challenging questions in class?55%
Teachers · How many students in your classes…do their work when they are supposed to?66%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (69%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.

Safety and School Climate

Inclusive Learning Environment95%city 96%

Teachers · At this school, students with disabilities are included in all school activities.95%
Teachers · This school educates students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment appropriate.92%
Teachers · School staff treat students of different genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations equally.94%
Teachers · School staff treat students of different races, cultures, or backgrounds equally.97%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (95%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Inclusive Leadership90%city 96%

Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…puts decisions made with families into action.88%
Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…works to create a sense of community in the school.87%
Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…ensures families are comfortable communicating with the school.88%
Parents · Language translation and interpretation are readily available to me at all family events at my child’s school.98%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (90%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Conflict Resolution86%city 90%

Teachers · Conflicts are resolved fairly in my school.78%
Parents · Conflicts are resolved fairly at my child’s school. [Grades K-5].94%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (86%) is their average, vs 90% citywide.

Innovation and Collective Responsibility84%city 81%

Teachers · How many teachers at this school…help build a welcoming school environment in the entire school, not just their classroom?84%
Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are actively trying to improve their teaching?100%
Teachers · How many teachers at this school…take responsibility for improving the school?76%
Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are eager to try new ideas?66%
Teachers · How many teachers at this school…feel responsible that all students learn?95%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (84%) is their average, vs 81% citywide.

Teacher-Teacher Trust83%city 88%

Teachers · Teachers in this school trust each other.84%
Teachers · It's OK in this school to discuss feelings, worries, and frustrations with other teachers.76%
Teachers · I feel respected by other teachers at this school.89%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (83%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.

Instructional Leadership82%city 89%

Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...makes clear to the staff their expectations for meeting instructional goals.87%
Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...understands how children learn.68%
Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...sets high standards for student learning.92%
Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…supports teachers in implementing what they have learned in professional development.76%
Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…carefully tracks student academic progress.95%
Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…knows what’s going on in my classes.71%
Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…provides teachers with formative feedback to improve practice.81%
Teachers · The principal/school leader at this school...participates in instructional planning with teams of teachers.89%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (82%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.

Peer Collaboration79%city 88%

Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader, teachers, and staff collaborate to make this school run effectively.71%
Teachers · At this school…teachers design instructional programs (e.g. lessons, units) together.87%
Teachers · At this school…teachers make a conscious effort to coordinate their teaching with instruction at other grade levels.79%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (79%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.

Program Coherence74%city 85%

Teachers · At this school…curriculum, instruction, and learning materials are well coordinated across the different grade levels at this school.75%
Teachers · At this school…once we start a new program, we follow up to make sure that it’s working.71%
Teachers · At this school…it is clear how all of the programs offered are connected to our school’s instructional vision.76%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (74%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.

Quality of Professional Development72%city 85%

Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...included enough time to think carefully about, try, and evaluate new ideas.68%
Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...Included opportunities to engage in inquiry-based, professional collaboration with peers and/or mentors from other schools.63%
Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...directly related to my students’ needs.84%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (72%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.

School Commitment67%city 85%

Teachers · I usually look forward to each working day at this school.79%
Teachers · I would recommend this school to parents/guardians seeking a place for their child.68%
Teachers · I would recommend this school to other teachers as a place to work.54%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (67%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.

Teacher-Principal Trust59%city 86%

Teachers · I feel respected by the principal/program leader at this school.66%
Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.45%
Teachers · The principal/program leader has confidence in the expertise of the teachers at this school.58%
Teachers · I trust the principal/program leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).58%
Teachers · The principal/program leader looks out for the personal welfare of the staff members.47%
Teachers · The principal/program leader places the needs of children ahead of personal interests.66%
Teachers · The principal and assistant principals function as a cohesive unit.76%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (59%) is their average, vs 86% citywide.

Teacher Influence43%city 68%

Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader encourages feedback through regular meetings with families and teacher leaders.76%
Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...hiring new professional personnel?34%
Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...planning how discretionary school funds should be used?22%
Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...selecting instructional materials and/or curriculum used in classrooms?29%
Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...setting standards for student behavior?53%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (43%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.

Relationships with Families

Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Teacher98%city 96%

Parents · My child’s teachers give me helpful ideas about how I can support my child’s learning and development. [Birth-5].96%
Parents · My child’s teachers let me know that I can make a difference in my child’s learning. [Birth-5].100%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (98%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Strong Relationships96%city 97%

Parents · I feel good about the way that my child’s teachers helped my child adjust to their program. [Birth-5].96%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 97% citywide.

Parent Involvement in School93%city 92%

Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…communicated with your child's teachers about your child's performance?89%
Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…seen your child’s projects, artwork, homework, tests, or quizzes?88%
Parents · I know how to contact the Parent Coordinator at my child’s school.95%
Parents · During the school year, have you...attended a school meeting, school event, or parent-teacher conference (virtually or in-person)?91%
Parents · My child’s teachers incorporate my feedback into how they support my child. [Birth-5].100%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.

Parent-Principal Trust88%city 96%

Parents · I feel respected by my child's principal/school leader.88%
Parents · I trust the principal/school leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).87%
Parents · The principal/school leader is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.88%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.

Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Advocate86%city 87%

Parents · Someone at my child's program has helped me consider which schools or programs would be best for my child for next school/program year. [Birth-5].86%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (86%) is their average, vs 87% citywide.

School Description

School Facilities and Services72%city 88%

Teachers · This school is kept clean.59%
Teachers · This school is kept in good physical condition.63%
Teachers · Physical repairs to the school building are completed in a timely manner.37%
Parents · This school is kept clean.85%
Parents · This school is kept in good physical condition.85%
Parents · My child's school provides me information about transportation options (e.g. Metrocard and busing).79%
Parents · I am satisfied with my child’s school bus transportation service this year.74%
Parents · I am satisfied with the meal options provided at my child’s school.95%

Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (72%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.

Overall positive % is averaged across every Pos/Neg survey question per respondent group (school year 2025-2026). Survey topics are the DOE’s framework measures (each the average favorable response across its questions; expand a topic to see them and the citywide average); the dimension scores themselves are no longer in the public data file.^[3]

Operational health

Attendance

96%

Chronic absenteeism

36%

Suspension rate

Teachers^[7]

Teachers with 4+ years' experience

86%

Students per teacher

10:1

Teaching out of certification

Teacher experience and certification from the NYSED School Report Card (2024–25); students per teacher = enrollment ÷ reported teachers. Fewer than 4 years counts as inexperienced.

Student body

Race / ethnicity^[4]

Black 10%
Hispanic 88%
Multiracial 2%

School-level totals; may not sum to 100% due to rounding and small subgroup suppression.

Gender^[4]

Female 48%
Male 52%

Female / male shares as published by the DOE; other gender identities aren’t reported in the source data.

Enrollment

346

Economic Need Index

—

Free / reduced lunch

96%

English learners

24%

Students with IEPs

32%

Admissions

2 programs. Each has its own admissions method, and each track within a program has its own seats, demand, and priority order.

3-K - School Day

Program code 10X3103K · Cycle 2024-2025

Zoned

42 applicants · 30 seats last year; every priority group with applicants received offers.

priority group	Seats	Applicants	Applications / seat
General education	30	42	—
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school.	—	—	—
↳ Other students who live in the zone.	15	15	1.00
↳ Students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school.	—	—	—
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school.	—	—	—
↳ Other students who live in the district.	15	25	1.67
↳ All other applicants.	—	—	—

Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).

Pre-K - School Day

Program code 10X310PK · Cycle 2024-2025

Zoned

47 applicants · 54 seats last year; every priority group with applicants received offers.

priority group	Seats	Applicants	Applications / seat
General education	54	47	—
↳ Current students.	25	25	1.00
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school.	—	—	—
↳ Other students who live in the zone.	10	10	1.00
↳ Students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school.	—	—	—
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school.	—	—	—
↳ Other students who live in the district.	10	10	1.00
↳ All other applicants.	—	—	—

Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).

How to read Applications / seat and where the outlook buckets come from is explained in our methodology.

Financials

^[8]^[9]

What this school has to spend, and what it spends it on. Spending is not a measure of quality. Schools serving more students with higher needs receive more money.

Spending

Total spend

$15.5MStudents: 406

59th percentile citywide

School-managed budget

$9.9MPositions: 72

67th percentile citywide

Total spend per student

$38,293

72nd percentile citywide · city median $33,357

Staffing costs

Principal’s salary

$188K

17th percentile citywide

Principal and assistant principals

$569KPositions: 3

71st percentile citywide

Teaching staff

$5.0MPositions: 39

62nd percentile citywide

Where the school-managed budget goes

These five categories add up to the school-managed budget. They do not include the centrally-paid costs in total spend.

PositionsAvg eachBudget

Leadership3$190K$569K

ASST HEAD OF SCHOOL2$190K$381K
HEAD OF SCHOOL1$188K$188K

Teachers39$127K$5.0M

Pre K / WHOLE CLASS3$167K$501K
3-K / WHOLE CLASS2$167K$334K
5 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher3$110K$330K
3 / WHOLE CLASS2$141K$282K
4 / WHOLE CLASS2$141K$282K
2 / WHOLE CLASS2$120K$239K
3 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher2$115K$229K
K / WHOLE CLASS2$113K$226K
SOCIAL STUDIES / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$211K$211K
ESL / PUSH IN-All Students1$167K$167K
PHYSICAL EDUCATION / WHOLE CLASS1$164K$164K
LIBRARY / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$163K$163K
SCIENCE - GENERAL SCIENCE / WHOLE CLASS1$141K$141K
1 / WHOLE CLASS2$69K$138K
K / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$134K$134K
COMPUTER / WHOLE CLASS1$130K$130K
MUSIC / WHOLE CLASS1$127K$127K
MATH / WHOLE CLASS1$122K$122K
1 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$115K$115K
1 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$115K$115K
2 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$115K$115K
4 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$115K$115K
4 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$115K$115K
5 / WHOLE CLASS1$115K$115K
ESL / WHOLE CLASS1$115K$115K
K / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$115K$115K
K / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$115K$115K
4 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$7,962$7,962

Support staff29$88K$2.5M

SPEECH / PUSH IN/PULL OUT3$117K$351K
School Aides and Other Support Staff0—$258K
School Social Workers Mandated Services2$120K$241K
PRE-K3$78K$233K
IEP-HEALTH5$40K$201K
SETSS / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$89K$178K
INTERVENTION / PREVENTION / PULL-OUT - Special Ed1$167K$167K
School Secretary2$82K$165K
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$71K$142K
CLASSROOM - Special Ed3$43K$128K
Guidance Counselor1$125K$125K
School Psychologist Mandated Services1$120K$120K
CLASSROOM - General Ed1$78K$78K
PARENT COORDINATOR1$56K$56K
IEP-TOILETING1$45K$45K
DC 37 Para More Than 20 Hrs0—$42K
IEP-CRISIS MANAGEMENT(CIT)1$11K$11K

Programs and extra time$1.1M

People Working Partial Year$360K
IEP-HEALTH$329K
Absence Coverage$135K
LITERACY COACH1$115K$115K
AFTER/BEFORE SCHOOL STUDENT PROGRAMS$113K
Not Available$29K
SUMMER STUDENT PROGRAMS$12K

Supplies and services$774K

Supplies - General$402K
Educational Consultants$89K
Non-Contractual Services$72K
Educational Software$58K
Furniture Object 300$56K
Curriculum & Staff Development Contracts$40K
Equipment - General$20K
Transportation of Pupils - Contractual$12K
Data Processing Repair - Contractual$11K
School Funded Copier$6,465
Transportation of Staff - Non-Contract$4,500
Library Books$2,163

Total72$138K$9.9M

Location & commute

Where the school is and how to get there.

Get directions ↗

Loading map…