P.S. 123 Suydam
- 100 IRVING AVENUE, Brooklyn
- Grades K-5
- Donna Marie Stalzer, Principal
- 718-821-4810
- ps123k.org
About
P.S. 123 Suydam is an elementary school in Brooklyn serving grades K-5 with an enrollment of 408 students, which is near the citywide median. The school serves a student population with a high Economic Need Index of 91.0%, well above the citywide 75th percentile, and a high percentage of English Language Learners at 41.0%, also well above the citywide 75th percentile. Students with Individualized Education Programs comprise 25.0% of the enrollment, near the citywide median. In academic outcomes, 38.0% of students were proficient in ELA, which is below the citywide 25th percentile, while 44.0% were proficient in Math, which is above the citywide 25th percentile. The school offers a Spanish Dual Language program for Pre-K and Kindergarten. The school's safety and school climate received a "Good" rating, supported by a 0.0% suspension rate. In the 2025-2026 DOE School Survey, 99% of responding parents reported their child feels safe and belongs at the school. Parents also reported high satisfaction with communication and trust in the principal.
Sources (5)
- NYC DOE Location Code Generating and Management System (LCGMS) · 2026-27 (export of 2026-08-22)
- NYC DOE School Quality Reports and Snapshot, 2024-25 · 2024-25
- MySchools admissions directory, 2025-26 cycle · 2025-26 admissions cycle
- New York State Education Department School Report Card · 2024-25
- NYC School Survey (parent and student responses) · 2025-26
Academics
State test proficiency rates and acceleration.
ELA proficiency
38%
Math proficiency
44%
Proficiency rates are from the Grade 3–8 NYS state test (school-level).
Attendance rate
96%
Avg class size (general ed)
26.58
Avg class size (ICT)
26.33
Average class size by classroom setting: general education vs. ICT (Integrated Co-Teaching, where general- and special-education students learn together with two teachers). NYC DOE Class Size Report, 2021–22.
Community & climate
Demographics, attendance, school survey results, and DOE quality ratings.
Quality signals
DOE quality-rating labels are skewed across the system; read them relative to the citywide distribution in our methodology.
NYC School Survey, 2025-26
Parent survey · overall positive
95%39% response rate
Teacher survey · overall positive
81%72% response rate
Survey topics, 2025-26
Safety98%city 93%
- Teachers · My students are safe…outside around this school. [Elementary only].97%
- Teachers · My students are safe…traveling between home and this school. [Elementary only].94%
- Teachers · My students are safe…in the hallways, bathrooms, locker rooms, and cafeteria of this school. [Elementary only].100%
- Teachers · My students are safe…in my class(es). [Elementary only].100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (98%) is their average, vs 93% citywide.
Bullying prevention58%city 65%
- Teachers · At this school students harass, bully, or intimidate other students.58%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (58%) is their average, vs 65% citywide.
Emotional support75%city 84%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…help students develop the skills they need to complete challenging coursework despite obstacles?85%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…tell their students they believe they can achieve high academic standards?89%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…teach students how to advocate for themselves?77%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…recognize disruptive behavior as social-emotional learning opportunities?62%
- Teachers · How many adults at this school…have access to school-based supports to assist in behavioral/emotional escalations?62%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (75%) is their average, vs 84% citywide.
Academic expectations93%city 89%
- Teachers · In this school, the staff believes that all students can learn, including Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs), Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs), and students with disabilities.95%
- Teachers · This school has well-defined learning expectations for all students.95%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…have to work hard to do well?88%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (93%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.
College & career guidance88%city 90%
- Teachers · It’s a priority at this school that adults…provide students with opportunities to learn about different career paths. [Elementary/Middle Only].88%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 90% citywide.
Family outreach96%city 95%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers understand families' challenges and concerns.89%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers work closely with families to meet students' needs.97%
- Teachers · At this school…staff regularly communicate with families about how they can help students learn.100%
- Teachers · At this school…school staff value families' race, ethnicity, culture, family structure, and background.97%
- Parents · School staff regularly communicate with me about how I can help my child learn.95%
- Parents · Teachers work closely with me to meet my child's needs.94%
- Parents · My child's school communicates with me in a language that I can understand.99%
- Parents · I am greeted warmly when I contact or visit the school.98%
- Parents · My child's school will make me aware if there are any concerns about my child’s social or emotional well-being.98%
- Parents · If I suspect my child needs additional learning supports and services, I know the next steps to get support at my school.92%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (96%) is their average, vs 95% citywide.
Parent–teacher trust97%city 96%
- Parents · I feel respected by my child's teachers.99%
- Parents · Staff at this school work hard to build trusting relationships with parents/guardians like me.97%
- Parents · My child's teachers treat me as a partner in educating my child.95%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Show all survey topicsShow fewer
Instruction and Performance
Early Childhood Instruction100%city 94%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…meet the needs of the children in my classroom. [Early childhood].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…develop and facilitate intentional learning experiences grounded in the developmentally appropriate practices and play-based learning experiences emphasized in New York State Prekindergarten Learning Standards (NYSPLS) and/or Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework (ELOF). [Early childhood].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to…help children engage with books and materials, or in other learning activities reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Early childhood].100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (100%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.
Family Satisfaction with Child's Education94%city 94%
- Parents · My child is progressing in reading the way I would expect.92%
- Parents · My child is progressing in math the way I would expect.94%
- Parents · My child's school helps me understand what grade-level schoolwork looks like.94%
- Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The education my child has received this year.95%
- Parents · How satisfied are you with the following? The overall quality of my child's teachers this year.97%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 94% citywide.
IEP Service Satisfaction92%city 91%
- Parents · I am satisfied with the educational planning and Individualized Education Program (IEP) development process at this school. [Families of students with IEPs].91%
- Parents · At this school, my child receives what they need to achieve their Individualized Education Program (IEP) goal(s). [Families of students with IEPs].96%
- Parents · This school offers a wide enough variety of activities and services (including specialized programs, related services and assistive and adaptive technologies where appropriate) to help improve outcomes for my child. [Families of students with IEPs].88%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (92%) is their average, vs 91% citywide.
Cultural Awareness and Inclusive Classroom Instruction88%city 92%
- Teachers · I am able to...receive support around how to incorporate students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds in my practice.94%
- Teachers · I am able to...appropriately modify instructional activities and materials to meet the developmental needs and learning interests of all my students.89%
- Teachers · I am able to...ensure instruction represents multiple perspectives, cultures, and backgrounds.92%
- Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple races and ethnicities.92%
- Teachers · I am able to…ensure instruction represents multiple genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations.76%
- Teachers · I am able to...design instruction that is responsive to students’ needs (e.g. Multilingual Learners/English language learners (MLs/ELLs) or Emergent Multilingual Learners (EMLLs) proficiency and students with disabilities).89%
- Teachers · I am able to...apply my knowledge of parents' various cultural backgrounds when collaborating with them regarding their child's educational progress.100%
- Teachers · I am able to...develop appropriate Individualized Education Programs for my students with disabilities.94%
- Teachers · I am able to...monitor progress on Individualized Education Program goals for my students with disabilities.91%
- Teachers · I am able to...distinguish linguistic/cultural differences from learning difficulties.92%
- Teachers · I have conversations about race and racism at my school that help me examine my own beliefs around identity.59%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.
Strong Core Instruction86%city 92%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…reading and writing experiences grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational. [ELA].81%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [ELA].100%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [ELA].80%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [ELA].86%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [ELA].90%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to interact with complex grade-level text and tasks, using scaffolding where appropriate. [Math].94%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage with texts and tasks reflective of their diverse racial, cultural, and linguistic perspective. [Math].82%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…students to engage in meaningful discussion that critically examines topics that connect to the daily lives of students. [Math].82%
- Teachers · In planning my last instructional unit, I had the resources and tools I needed to include multiple opportunities for…focusing deeply on the concepts emphasized in the standards to help students build strong foundations for learning. [Math].82%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (86%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.
Quality of Student Discussion66%city 68%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…build on each other’s ideas during class discussions?53%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…use data or text references to support their ideas?61%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…show that they respect each other’s ideas?74%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…provide constructive feedback to their peers/teachers?58%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…participate in class discussions at some point?82%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (66%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.
Classroom Behavior63%city 68%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…listen carefully when the teacher gives directions?63%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…follow the rules in class?74%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…respond to challenging questions in class?42%
- Teachers · How many students in your classes…do their work when they are supposed to?74%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (63%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.
Safety and School Climate
Inclusive Leadership97%city 96%
- Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…puts decisions made with families into action.95%
- Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…works to create a sense of community in the school.98%
- Parents · The principal/school leader at this school…ensures families are comfortable communicating with the school.98%
- Parents · Language translation and interpretation are readily available to me at all family events at my child’s school.98%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Inclusive Learning Environment97%city 96%
- Teachers · At this school, students with disabilities are included in all school activities.97%
- Teachers · This school educates students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment appropriate.97%
- Teachers · School staff treat students of different genders, gender identities and expressions and sexual orientations equally.97%
- Teachers · School staff treat students of different races, cultures, or backgrounds equally.97%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (97%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Conflict Resolution92%city 90%
- Teachers · Conflicts are resolved fairly in my school.86%
- Parents · Conflicts are resolved fairly at my child’s school. [Grades K-5].97%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (92%) is their average, vs 90% citywide.
Instructional Leadership87%city 89%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...makes clear to the staff their expectations for meeting instructional goals.84%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...understands how children learn.84%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school...sets high standards for student learning.92%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…supports teachers in implementing what they have learned in professional development.82%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…carefully tracks student academic progress.95%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…knows what’s going on in my classes.76%
- Teachers · The principal/assistant principal(s) at this school…provides teachers with formative feedback to improve practice.89%
- Teachers · The principal/school leader at this school...participates in instructional planning with teams of teachers.95%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (87%) is their average, vs 89% citywide.
Teacher-Principal Trust84%city 86%
- Teachers · I feel respected by the principal/program leader at this school.87%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader at this school is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.84%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader has confidence in the expertise of the teachers at this school.76%
- Teachers · I trust the principal/program leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).84%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader looks out for the personal welfare of the staff members.84%
- Teachers · The principal/program leader places the needs of children ahead of personal interests.89%
- Teachers · The principal and assistant principals function as a cohesive unit.86%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (84%) is their average, vs 86% citywide.
Program Coherence84%city 85%
- Teachers · At this school…curriculum, instruction, and learning materials are well coordinated across the different grade levels at this school.83%
- Teachers · At this school…once we start a new program, we follow up to make sure that it’s working.87%
- Teachers · At this school…it is clear how all of the programs offered are connected to our school’s instructional vision.82%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (84%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.
School Commitment75%city 85%
- Teachers · I usually look forward to each working day at this school.82%
- Teachers · I would recommend this school to parents/guardians seeking a place for their child.76%
- Teachers · I would recommend this school to other teachers as a place to work.68%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (75%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.
Teacher-Teacher Trust75%city 88%
- Teachers · Teachers in this school trust each other.71%
- Teachers · It's OK in this school to discuss feelings, worries, and frustrations with other teachers.71%
- Teachers · I feel respected by other teachers at this school.84%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (75%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.
Quality of Professional Development75%city 85%
- Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...included enough time to think carefully about, try, and evaluate new ideas.74%
- Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...Included opportunities to engage in inquiry-based, professional collaboration with peers and/or mentors from other schools.76%
- Teachers · Overall, my professional development experiences this year have...directly related to my students’ needs.74%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (75%) is their average, vs 85% citywide.
Peer Collaboration74%city 88%
- Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader, teachers, and staff collaborate to make this school run effectively.89%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers design instructional programs (e.g. lessons, units) together.70%
- Teachers · At this school…teachers make a conscious effort to coordinate their teaching with instruction at other grade levels.62%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (74%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.
Innovation and Collective Responsibility67%city 81%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…help build a welcoming school environment in the entire school, not just their classroom?76%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are actively trying to improve their teaching?79%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…take responsibility for improving the school?55%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…are eager to try new ideas?50%
- Teachers · How many teachers at this school…feel responsible that all students learn?74%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (67%) is their average, vs 81% citywide.
Teacher Influence48%city 68%
- Teachers · At this school…the principal/program leader encourages feedback through regular meetings with families and teacher leaders.92%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...hiring new professional personnel?32%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...planning how discretionary school funds should be used?21%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...selecting instructional materials and/or curriculum used in classrooms?29%
- Teachers · How much influence do teachers have over school policy in...setting standards for student behavior?68%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (48%) is their average, vs 68% citywide.
Relationships with Families
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Teacher100%city 96%
- Parents · My child’s teachers give me helpful ideas about how I can support my child’s learning and development. [Birth-5].100%
- Parents · My child’s teachers let me know that I can make a difference in my child’s learning. [Birth-5].100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (100%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Strong Relationships100%city 97%
- Parents · I feel good about the way that my child’s teachers helped my child adjust to their program. [Birth-5].100%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (100%) is their average, vs 97% citywide.
Parent-Principal Trust99%city 96%
- Parents · I feel respected by my child's principal/school leader.99%
- Parents · I trust the principal/school leader at their word (to do what they say that they will do).98%
- Parents · The principal/school leader is an effective manager who makes the school run smoothly.99%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (99%) is their average, vs 96% citywide.
Parent Involvement in School94%city 92%
- Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…communicated with your child's teachers about your child's performance?97%
- Parents · Since the beginning of the school year, how often have you…seen your child’s projects, artwork, homework, tests, or quizzes?91%
- Parents · I know how to contact the Parent Coordinator at my child’s school.90%
- Parents · During the school year, have you...attended a school meeting, school event, or parent-teacher conference (virtually or in-person)?97%
- Parents · My child’s teachers incorporate my feedback into how they support my child. [Birth-5].93%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (94%) is their average, vs 92% citywide.
Building Families' Capacity as their Child's Primary Advocate92%city 87%
- Parents · Someone at my child's program has helped me consider which schools or programs would be best for my child for next school/program year. [Birth-5].92%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (92%) is their average, vs 87% citywide.
School Description
School Facilities and Services88%city 88%
- Teachers · This school is kept clean.97%
- Teachers · This school is kept in good physical condition.87%
- Teachers · Physical repairs to the school building are completed in a timely manner.71%
- Parents · This school is kept clean.96%
- Parents · This school is kept in good physical condition.96%
- Parents · My child's school provides me information about transportation options (e.g. Metrocard and busing).81%
- Parents · I am satisfied with my child’s school bus transportation service this year.92%
- Parents · I am satisfied with the meal options provided at my child’s school.80%
Each question’s favorable response rate; the topic score (88%) is their average, vs 88% citywide.
Overall positive % is averaged across every Pos/Neg survey question per respondent group (school year 2025-2026). Survey topics are the DOE’s framework measures (each the average favorable response across its questions; expand a topic to see them and the citywide average); the dimension scores themselves are no longer in the public data file.[3]
Operational health
Attendance
96%
Chronic absenteeism
35%
Suspension rate
0%
Teachers[7]
Teachers with 4+ years' experience
56%
Students per teacher
9:1
Teaching out of certification
12%
Teacher experience and certification from the NYSED School Report Card (2024–25); students per teacher = enrollment ÷ reported teachers. Fewer than 4 years counts as inexperienced.
Student body
Race / ethnicity[4]
- Black 5%
- Hispanic 91%
- White 1%
School-level totals; may not sum to 100% due to rounding and small subgroup suppression.
Gender[4]
- Female 49%
- Male 51%
Female / male shares as published by the DOE; other gender identities aren’t reported in the source data.
Enrollment
408
Economic Need Index
91%
Free / reduced lunch
96%
English learners
41%
Students with IEPs
25%
Admissions
2 programs. Each has its own admissions method, and each track within a program has its own seats, demand, and priority order.
Kindergarten (32K123)
Program code 32K123KG · Cycle 2024-2025
42 applicants · 50 seats last year; every priority group with applicants received offers.
| priority group | Seats | Applicants | Applications / seat |
|---|---|---|---|
| General education | 50 | 42 | — |
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the zone. | 20 | 20 | 1.00 |
↳ Students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live in the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the district. | 10 | 10 | 1.00 |
↳ Other students who live outside the district. | — | — | — |
Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).
Kindergarten Spanish Dual Language (32K123)
Program code 32K123SP · Cycle 2024-2025
20 applicants · 25 seats last year.
| priority group | Seats | Applicants | Applications / seat |
|---|---|---|---|
| General education | 25 | 20 | — |
↳ Students who live in the zone and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the zone. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live in the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district and have a sibling at the school. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live in the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K. | — | — | — |
↳ Students who live outside the district who are currently enrolled at the school for pre-K. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live in the district. | — | — | — |
↳ Other students who live outside the district. | — | — | — |
Last year’s published figures. Schools make more offers than seats because not everyone enrolls, so offers can exceed seats. Counts under 10 are suppressed (shown as “<10”).
How to read Applications / seat and where the outlook buckets come from is explained in our methodology.
Spending
Total spend
$17.2MStudents: 454
66th percentile citywide
School-managed budget
$10.3MPositions: 77
69th percentile citywide
Total spend per student
$37,861
70th percentile citywide · city median $33,357
Staffing costs
Principal’s salary
$188K
17th percentile citywide
Principal and assistant principals
$472KPositions: 3
45th percentile citywide
Teaching staff
$5.4MPositions: 45
67th percentile citywide
Where the school-managed budget goes
These five categories add up to the school-managed budget. They do not include the centrally-paid costs in total spend.
Leadership3$157K$472K
- AP - ORGANIZATION2$142K$284K
- HEAD OF SCHOOL1$188K$188K
Teachers45$120K$5.4M
- 5 / WHOLE CLASS3$121K$364K
- 2 / WHOLE CLASS2$170K$339K
- 1 / WHOLE CLASS3$109K$327K
- 4 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher3$105K$316K
- Pre K / WHOLE CLASS2$153K$307K
- ESL / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$122K$245K
- K / WHOLE CLASS2$105K$210K
- 4 / ICT - General Ed Teacher2$93K$187K
- 2 / REDUCED CLASS SIZE1$153K$153K
- 3-K / WHOLE CLASS1$153K$153K
- PHYSICAL EDUCATION / WHOLE CLASS1$153K$153K
- 1 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$151K$151K
- SCIENCE - GENERAL SCIENCE / WHOLE CLASS1$143K$143K
- SOCIAL STUDIES / WHOLE CLASS1$139K$139K
- K / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$138K$138K
- 3 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$131K$131K
- 2 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$130K$130K
- 1, 2 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$126K$126K
- 2 / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$125K$125K
- PHYSICAL EDUCATION / SUBJECT SPECIFIC1$124K$124K
- 3 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$120K$120K
- 3 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$119K$119K
- 2,3,4,5 / WHOLE CLASS1$118K$118K
- ARTS / WHOLE CLASS1$115K$115K
- 4 / WHOLE CLASS2$57K$114K
- MUSIC INSTRUMENTAL / WHOLE CLASS1$113K$113K
- 1 / ICT - Special Ed Teacher1$105K$105K
- 3 / WHOLE CLASS1$105K$105K
- 3, 4 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$105K$105K
- 5 / SELF-CONTAINED SP ED1$105K$105K
- K / ICT - General Ed Teacher1$105K$105K
- MATH / WHOLE CLASS1$105K$105K
- PROGRAM SPECIALIST / WHOLE CLASS1$105K$105K
Support staff29$96K$2.8M
- School Aides and Other Support Staff2$190K$380K
- SPEECH / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$117K$234K
- PRE-K3$78K$233K
- SETSS / PUSH IN/PULL OUT2$105K$210K
- CLASSROOM - Special Ed4$51K$205K
- IEP-HEALTH3$48K$144K
- Guidance Counselor Bilingual1$137K$137K
- School Secretary2$66K$131K
- School Psychologist1$120K$120K
- School Social Worker1$120K$120K
- School Social Workers Mandated Services1$120K$120K
- SPEECH / PUSH-IN -special ed1$117K$117K
- INTERVENTION / PREVENTION / PULL-OUT -all students1$105K$105K
- INTERVENTION / PREVENTION / PUSH IN/PULL OUT1$105K$105K
- PHYSICAL THERAPY / PUSH IN/PULL OUT1$92K$92K
- OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY / PULL-OUT -all students1$91K$91K
- OUTREACH0—$83K
- PARENT COORDINATOR1$67K$67K
- DC 37 Para More Than 20 Hrs0—$52K
- IEP-CRISIS MANAGEMENT(CIT)1$45K$45K
Programs and extra time$1.1M
- People Working Partial Year$341K
- AFTER/BEFORE SCHOOL STUDENT PROGRAMS$254K
- Absence Coverage$153K
- IEP-HEALTH$137K
- IEP-CRISIS MANAGEMENT(CIT)$127K
- Not Available$43K
- IEP-AWAITING PLACEMENT$35K
- IEP-ALTERNATE PLACEMENT$20K
Supplies and services$483K
- Supplies - General$183K
- Educational Consultants$63K
- Curriculum & Staff Development Contracts$57K
- Non-Contractual Services$56K
- Educational Software$39K
- Furniture Object 300$20K
- Summer Non-Professional 016$18K
- Set Aside for Class Size Reduction$17K
- Data Processing Repair - Contractual$14K
- School Funded Copier$9,948
- Library Books$2,550
- Office Temp Services - Contractual$2,470
Location & commute
Where the school is and how to get there.